thewealthnet     About Us    |    FAQs    |    Contact Us
  Advanced Search       RSS Feed  twitter  linkedin 
Welcome to thewealthnet    |   Europe, Middle East & Africa Get The App   |   Login
  Tue 12th Dec 2017  |    Make this my homepage  
Subscribe now!
Credit Cards Accepted
World Map
Former Credit Suisse banker loses case over £57,000 taken under UK-Swiss tax accord
17/05/2017 , News Team

A former Credit Suisse banker who had £57,000 taken from her bank account by her employer to comply with the requirements of the UK-Swiss tax cooperation agreement has lost a claim in the High Court for a refund of most of the levy from HMRC.

As a result, HMRC will not have to refund £57,865 to UK resident Karin Vrang, a Swedish national obtained from her Swiss bank account.

The money was taken from Ms Vrang’s account without her permission after she failed to respond appropriately to messages from Credit Suisse and HMRC. The amount was  taken as part of a deal between UK and Swiss authorities, which allowed individuals to remain anonymous in exchange for a levy of a proportional amount from their account.

The banker worked in Switzerland for Credit Suisse Asset Management between 1998 and 2005, when she moved to London to take up residency. She had three bank accounts in Switzerland with Credit Suisse, into which she put her earnings while there as well as her encashed Swiss pension. The money in those accounts was to be used when she retired to Sweden.

Ms Vrang’s complaint was that the money was “wrongly levied”. She asserted that the HMRC should pay back the difference between the amount taken from her account as part of the levy and the amount originally due in tax, which reportedly amounted to between £1,000 and £7,000.

In her witness statement, Ms  Vrang said that she did not think the UK/Swiss agreement was “aimed at those who, like her, were not tax evaders, had no tax advisers, paid their taxes and expected to be treated fairly".

She said she also thought that, were the HMRC enforcing a debt from a UK taxpayer in the UK by taking money from his bank account, “there would have been greater safeguards for the taxpayer, including a face-to-face visit.”

The High Court ruling, however, declared that “it was [Vrang’s] fault that the levy was taken because she had failed to deal with perfectly clear correspondence.”

A statement from the Revenue said: “HMRC welcomes the court’s decision, which highlights the importance of giving offshore financial matters close attention and seeking appropriate advice to ensure you pay the right amount at the right time.”

Ms Vrang said she would appeal against the judgement.

Share with Linkedin Share with Twitter
Poor   Average   Good   Excellent
thewealthnet archives contain 48,094 articles dating back to 1997,making it the largest single source of information on the wealth management industry world-wide. To search for more articles, please click here.


© This article originally featured on thewealthnet. It is protected by international copyright law. If you copy this article illegally, you will be liable to prosecution. All rights in and relating to this article are expressly reserved. No part of this article may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means without written permission from the publishers.

    Latest Headlines:    by Topic | All News
  Advertise   |   Contribute   |   Press Release   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy   |   Contact Us Copyright Pam Insight Ltd., All Rights Reserved